The internal audit
Asks: does this process or clause work as the management system says it does?
Who: an internal auditor independent of the work.
Output: graded findings and audit results, which become an input to the review.
This free ISO management review checklist is for quality, environmental, information security and health and safety managers who prepare the review, and for the top management who chair it. One run is one review of a management system, whether a single standard or an integrated system covering several. It plans the review and its attendees, gathers the inputs, from previous actions and changes through performance data to resources, risks and improvement ideas, and runs the meeting to a clear conclusion. It then records the outputs as decisions and actions with owners and dates, gets the minutes approved and retained, and follows the actions up before the next review.
A management review is the meeting where top management looks at how the management system is performing and decides what to change. ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 45001 each expect one at planned intervals, and ISO says its management system standards are all structured in the same way, so one meeting can cover several of them. It is not an audit. An audit tests whether the system works as described; the review takes the audit results as one input among many and turns them into decisions, resources and actions.
This checklist runs one review from planning to follow-up. The internal audits that feed it and the corrective actions that come out of it each have their own checklist: the ISO 9001 Internal Audit Checklist and the ISO 27001 Internal Audit Checklist before it, and the CAPA Checklist after it.
Asks: does this process or clause work as the management system says it does?
Who: an internal auditor independent of the work.
Output: graded findings and audit results, which become an input to the review.
Asks: is the system still suitable, adequate and effective, and what should change?
Who: top management, prepared by the management system lead.
Output: approved minutes with decisions, changes, resources and actions with owners and dates.
Asks: why did this nonconformity happen, and has the fix worked?
Who: the CAPA owner and the quality manager.
Output: a closed CAPA with evidence it worked, reported at the next review.
Eight phases follow one management review, from planning it to following up its actions. The standards in scope add a note and an input task for each one. An integrated review adds a task to combine the inputs and a check that every standard was covered, and a review triggered by a significant change adds a task to describe the change and a decision about it. Top management approves the minutes and the action plan before the follow-up can be completed.
The management system lead plans the review with the chair. Enter the meeting date first: every due date counts back or forward from it. Why the review is happening and which standards it covers add the matching notes and tasks.
Start where the last review ended. Then record what has changed, inside and outside the organisation, since that review.
Bring numbers and trends for the whole period, not last month’s figure. Each input owner summarises their own area, and a task for each standard in scope follows the shared inputs.
These inputs look forward. Then put every input into one pack and send it a week before the meeting, so attendees read it before they arrive.
Top management chairs the meeting and makes the decisions. Work through every input on the agenda, then reach a conclusion on the management system as a whole.
Outputs are decisions, not a summary of the discussion. Each decision that needs work becomes an action with one owner and a date.
The minutes are the record that the review happened and what it decided. Nothing after the approval can be completed until top management records a decision.
A review is only as good as its follow-up. Check the actions between reviews, and carry anything still open into the next one.
Check which edition each of your certificates refers to before the review, and plan any transition as an action. The editions and status below are as iso.org showed them on 20 October 2026. The last column lists typical inputs in plain words; your own standard and certification body set what is required.
| Standard | Edition on iso.org (October 2026) | Status | Inputs to add for this standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001 (quality) | ISO 9001:2026, published 16 September 2026 | Current. ISO 9001:2015 is withdrawn; certified organisations move to the new edition within the timeframe of their certification cycle. | Process performance, product and service conformity, customer satisfaction and supplier performance |
| ISO 14001 (environment) | ISO 14001:2026, published April 2026 | Current. ISO 14001:2015 is withdrawn; iso.org says the transition typically takes around three years. | The evaluation of compliance, significant environmental aspects, environmental incidents and complaints |
| ISO/IEC 27001 (information security) | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, with Amendment 1:2024 | Current. | The risk assessment and risk treatment plan, security incidents and near misses, and control performance |
| ISO 45001 (occupational health and safety) | ISO 45001:2018 | Current, but under revision. iso.org shows a draft expected soon and a new edition planned as ISO 45001:2027. | Incidents, ill health and near misses, worker consultation and participation, and the evaluation of compliance |
Clause numbers. Each of these standards has a management review clause in its performance evaluation section, with the inputs and outputs it expects. ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 have new 2026 editions, so read the clause in the edition you are certified to rather than an older summary.
Shared inputs. Status of previous actions, changes in issues and interested parties, audit results, nonconformities and corrective actions, objectives, resources, risks and opportunities, and opportunities for improvement are common to all four. Phases 2 to 4 cover them once; the last column is what each standard adds.
Input tasks fall due one to two weeks before the meeting, counted back from its date, and are assigned to the management system lead. Overdue tasks alert their assignees, and a yearly recurring schedule starts each review on time. Reviews still open show on the Reports Grid.
Tick the standards in scope and each one adds its own note and input task. An integrated review adds a task to combine shared inputs and a check that every standard got its own conclusion. A review triggered by a significant change adds the change to the agenda.
The chair approves the minutes and the action plan, and nothing after that approval step can be completed until a decision is recorded. The agenda, input pack and approved minutes are uploaded to the tasks that produced them, with who did each step and when.
CheckFlow does not certify anything or replace your standard, your certification body or a document control system. It makes sure the review happens on time, that every input arrives, and that every decision becomes an action with an owner and a date. Compliance checklist software shows how recurring reviews like this one run alongside audits and other checks.
Feed the review from the ISO 9001 Internal Audit Checklist or the ISO 27001 Internal Audit Checklist, run the year of an environmental or safety system with the ISO 14001 Checklist or the ISO 45001 Checklist, and send actions that need a root cause to the CAPA Checklist. Building a system from scratch starts with the ISO Compliance Checklist.

ISO 9001 Internal Audit Checklist

CAPA (Corrective & Preventive Action) Checklist

ISO 14001 Environmental Management Checklist

ISO 45001 Occupational Health & Safety Checklist

ISO 27001 Internal Audit Checklist
Describe the process in a sentence and the AI checklist generator drafts the phases and tasks for you.
A meeting, held at planned intervals, where top management looks at how the management system is performing and decides what to change. It covers the status of earlier actions, what has changed inside and outside the organisation, performance data such as audit results and nonconformities, resources, risks and opportunities. The outputs are decisions, changes to the system, resources and actions with owners and dates, recorded in minutes that are kept as evidence.
The standards ask for reviews at planned intervals and leave the interval to you. Many organisations hold one a year, more often while a new system is bedding in, and an extra review after a significant change such as a merger, a new site or a serious incident. Whatever you choose, plan it so a recent review exists before each certification or surveillance audit,.
Typically: the status of actions from previous reviews; changes in external and internal issues and in interested parties’ needs; performance information such as nonconformities and corrective actions, monitoring and measurement results, audit results, progress against objectives, customer or interested-party feedback and supplier performance; whether resources are adequate; how well actions on risks and opportunities worked; and opportunities for improvement. Each standard adds its own, such as the evaluation of compliance for ISO 14001.
Decisions on opportunities for improvement, any changes needed to the management system, the resources needed, and actions with a named owner and a due date. Record a conclusion on whether the system is still suitable, adequate and effective, have top management approve the minutes, and keep them as documented information. An action that needs a root cause found belongs in your CAPA process.
An internal audit tests whether a process or clause works as described, and an independent auditor grades what they find. A management review is run by top management and looks at the whole system: it takes the audit results as one input, alongside performance data, changes and resources, and decides what to do. Use the ISO 9001 Internal Audit Checklist for the audit and this checklist for the review.
Yes. ISO says its management system standards are all structured in the same way, which is what makes an integrated management system possible. One meeting can review several standards if every standard’s inputs are covered and each gets its own conclusion. Report shared inputs, such as audit results, resources and objectives, once, and mark the inputs that belong to one standard against it.
iso.org now lists ISO 9001:2015 as withdrawn and replaced by ISO 9001:2026, published on 16 September 2026. ISO says certified organisations will transition to the new edition within the timeframe set by their certification cycle, and should ask their certification body for details. ISO 14001:2015 has also been replaced, by ISO 14001:2026. Add the transition to your next management review as an action.
14-day free trial, no card required. The Business plan is $10 per user per month after the trial. Full details at checkflow.io/pricing.
14-day free trial, no credit cardFull refund in your first 30 daysUS hosting, EU on request