The chase is scheduled, not remembered
Enter the return deadline once and dynamic due dates place the reminder, the first chase and the escalation around it. An annual recurring schedule starts next year’s campaign on the same date.
This free conflict of interest declaration checklist is for compliance leads, company secretaries, charity governance officers and the HR teams who run the yearly campaign. It refreshes the policy and form, defines who must declare, chases every return, reviews each disclosure against your own records, agrees a mitigation plan where one is needed, and ends with an approved register reported to the board. A campaign that only collects forms proves people were asked. This one shows what you did with the answers.
Most conflict rules bite when a decision is made, not once a year. A UK company director must declare an interest in a proposed transaction to the other directors before the company enters into it, under section 177 of the Companies Act 2006. The Charity Commission’s guidance CC29, updated in April 2026, asks trustees to declare conflicts at the start of each meeting and to record them in the minutes.
The annual campaign is what makes those moments work. It refreshes the register that a chair, a buyer or a grants panel checks before a decision, catches interests nobody thought to mention, and gives the board evidence the policy is applied. CC29 says a charity’s policy should list the information collected when trustees join and every year. In the US, Form 990 asks tax-exempt organisations whether their officers, directors, trustees and key employees must disclose their interests annually.
Covers: outside roles, shareholdings, gifts and hospitality, family links and related parties.
Output: an updated register of interests and a decision on each disclosure.
Weak spot: it describes the position on one date and goes stale as roles change.
Covers: an interest in a specific contract, appointment, grant or purchase.
Output: a declaration in the minutes or file, and the conflicted person stepping out.
Weak spot: it relies on people recognising the conflict themselves, in the moment.
Rewriting the policy itself belongs to the Annual Policy Review Checklist. A report that someone hid a conflict is a whistleblowing matter for the Whistleblowing Report Handling Checklist. Regulated financial firms tracking codes of ethics, licences and personal dealing alongside conflicts can use the Employee Compliance Certification Tracking Checklist.
Six phases, one checklist per annual campaign. Chase dates run from your return deadline, and the mitigation phase appears only when a conflict needs managing.
The first task sets the return deadline, records which rules apply to you and names the person who approves the register.
Due dates count from the return deadline set in Phase 1, so the chase runs on time without anyone remembering it.
Each disclosure is a row in a table on the first task. The directors’ check appears for UK companies, and the last answer decides whether Phase 5 appears.
Shown only when Phase 4 records at least one conflict that needs managing.
The register approval is assigned to the compliance lead or company secretary named in Phase 1. The filing task appears for US organisations.
Which rules apply depends on what your organisation is. The table lists the main UK and US sources, who they bind and the phase that produces the evidence. Articles, governing documents, funder terms and sector regulators often add more, so treat the table as a starting point, not legal advice.
| Source | Applies to | What it requires | Evidenced in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Companies Act 2006, s.175 | UK company directors | Avoid conflicts; board authorisation possible in a private company unless the constitution prevents it, in a public company only if the articles allow; authorisation counts only if quorum and vote are met without the conflicted director | Phases 4 and 5 |
| Companies Act 2006, s.176 | UK company directors | Do not accept benefits from third parties given because of the directorship, unless no conflict is reasonably likely | Phase 1 |
| Companies Act 2006, ss.177 and 182–185 | UK company directors | Declare the nature and extent of an interest in a proposed transaction before it is entered into, and in an existing one as soon as reasonably practicable; failing to declare under s.182 is an offence (s.183) | Phase 4 |
| Charity Commission CC29 (April 2026) | Charity trustees in England and Wales | Identify, declare, remove or manage, and record conflicts; a policy and a register updated when trustees join and annually | Phases 1, 4 and 6 |
| IRS Form 990, Part VI, lines 12a–c | US tax-exempt organisations filing Form 990 | Report whether there is a written policy, whether annual disclosure is required, and how compliance is monitored and enforced (Schedule O) | Phases 1, 3 and 6 |
| 2 CFR 200.112 and 200.318(c)(1) | US federal award recipients and subrecipients | Disclose potential conflicts in writing to the agency or pass-through entity; written standards of conduct for staff involved in contracts | Phases 5 and 6 |
| Regulation S-K, Item 404 | SEC registrants | Disclose related-person transactions over $120,000 and the policy for reviewing them | Phases 4 and 6 |
| ISO 37009:2025 | Any organisation (voluntary guidance) | Identify, assess, resolve and monitor conflicts, distinguishing actual, apparent and potential | Phases 4 and 5 |
Two sources changed recently. The Charity Commission updated CC29 on 22 April 2026 and retitled it Identifying and managing conflicts of interest in a charity, so check any policy wording that quotes the old guide. The 2024 revision of the US Uniform Guidance, which applies to federal awards made from 1 October 2024, gives section 200.112 its current wording; older awards may still carry earlier terms. Form 990 is explicit that the Part VI policies are generally not required by the tax code, though every organisation must answer the questions. Nothing on this page is legal advice.
Enter the return deadline once and dynamic due dates place the reminder, the first chase and the escalation around it. An annual recurring schedule starts next year’s campaign on the same date.
A table inside the review task holds one row per disclosure, with its classification and reasoning. Keep last year’s register as a data set to spot what changed. Answer Yes to the mitigation question and the plan tasks appear.
The register sign-off runs as an approval, and the activity trail records who reviewed each disclosure and when. Template versioning shows which form and thresholds applied in each year.
CheckFlow is not a disclosure portal, a case-management system or a legal adviser. It runs the campaign, tracks who has returned a form and holds the review decisions; the form itself can be a file upload or arrive through Zapier or the REST API from the tool you already use. Keep declarations in a workspace with access limited to the people reviewing them.
Conflicts declared at a single meeting belong in the minutes, and the Nonprofit Board Meeting Checklist prompts for them. Where an undeclared interest sits next to a payment approval, the Segregation of Duties Review Checklist checks the access side. Wider gaps in how the legal function handles conflicts show up in the Legal Department Compliance Audit Checklist.
Any situation where a personal interest, or the interest of someone connected to you, could pull against your duty to the organisation. CC29 separates financial conflicts, where you or a connected person could gain, from loyalty conflicts, such as a decision affecting your employer, a relative or another charity you serve. Definitions differ: the Form 990 instructions leave out competing duties to two organisations unless a material financial interest is involved, so write yours into the policy.
Outside employment and directorships, shareholdings above your threshold, gifts and hospitality received, close family members working for suppliers, customers or competitors, and any other relationship that could influence a decision. Add a plain statement that the person has nothing to declare, so a blank form is never mistaken for a nil return, and a commitment to update the declaration when circumstances change.
At a minimum, the board: directors, trustees and officers. Form 990 asks about officers, directors, trustees and key employees. Beyond that, include anyone who can steer money or decisions, such as buyers, grant assessors, investment staff and contractors in those roles. Asking everyone adds review work and few findings, so most organisations define the population by role.
No. Under section 177 of the Companies Act 2006 a director must declare an interest in a proposed transaction to the other directors before the company enters into it, at a meeting or by written or general notice. Section 182 covers existing transactions. A general notice under section 185 can cover dealings with a named company or person, but it takes effect only when given at a board meeting or brought up and read at the next one.
Part VI line 12a asks whether the organisation had a written conflict of interest policy, line 12b whether officers, directors, trustees and key employees had to disclose interests annually, and line 12c whether it regularly and consistently monitored and enforced compliance. A Yes to 12c needs a Schedule O description of who is covered, who decides and what restrictions apply.
Someone independent decides whether it is a real conflict and how to handle it. For a financial conflict, CC29 sets a minimum for trustees: declare it, leave the discussion, take no part in the decision and do not count towards the quorum. Serious conflicts may need the person to step back from a role or the arrangement to be dropped. Record the decision either way.
14-day free trial, no card required. The Business plan is $10 per user per month after the trial. Full details at checkflow.io/pricing.